Right of Private Defence of Body 

Section 35(a) provides that every person has a right subject to the restrictions contained under Section 37, to defend his own body and the body of any other person against any offence affecting human body. 

Offences affecting human body are defined and made punishable under Chapter 6 Section 100 - Section 146 of the BNS. 


• ROPD of Body extends to causing death 


Section 38 of the BNS provides that the right of private defence of body extends to the voluntary causing death or any other harm to the assailant subject to the restrictions contained in Section 37 of the BNS. 


Section 38 bare act: 


Yashwant Rao Vs State of Madhya Pradesh (rape, unnatural lust)


Vishwanath Vs State of Uttar Pradesh (kidnapping, abduction)


The accused's sister was staying with her father and brother (accused) because she did not want to live with her husband. One day, the deceased husband came to the house of the accused and tried to drag away his wife. The wife caught hold of the door as she was being taken out and a tug of war followed between her and her husband. At this stage, the brother of the wife took out the knife and deceased once. The knife penetrated the heart and he fell down senseless and thereafter died.


The accused put up the plea that his case would come under 5th clause of Section 100 of IPC (Section 38 BNS). The prosecution contended that IPC did not make abduction a pure and simple offence. As abduction coupled with certain intent such as murder, wrongful confinement etc is alone an offence. So, the ROPD of Body under 5th clause of Section 100 will be available only when the abduction is with some other intent. It is not just abduction, the benefit of Section 100 is not available.


The SC while rejecting the contention of prosecution held that abduction in 5th clause of Section 100 meaning abduction simpliciter as defined in the Section 362 IPC (Section 138 BNS) i.e where a person is compelled by force to go from any place. 


The SC further ruled that the moment there is an assault with the intention to abduct, the ROPD is available and therefore the brother is not held liable and acquitted. 


• ROPD of Body extending to harm other than death (Section 39) 


• Commencement and continuance of ROPD of Body (Section 40) 


In exercise of ROPD against a deadly assault effectual exercise of Right is permissible even when there is a risk to an innocent person (Section 44)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Origin and Development of Human Rights

Law of Contract I

Schools of Jurisprudence